Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2. The brief averments of the complaint are that the complainant got a seat in MS in Chicago University (USA) and has to join in the college on 10.08.2012; that opposite party No.1 is a service provider agency of opposite party No.2; that the complainant approached opposite party No.1 to purchase the flight ticket upto Chicago and paid Rs.45,500/- as demanded by the Opposite Party No.1 towards flight charges by way of cheque; that Opposite Party No.1 confirmed the complainant about the reservation of the ticket through Opposite Party No.2 and travel details also reflecting in the website of Yatra.com; that the flight ticket bears No.DV 742 G and the date of travel was from the Hyderabad on 06.08.2012; that suddenly the complainant came to know on 05.08.2012 that his ticket was confirmed upto Dubai only and then made enquiries with Opposite Parties who gave irrelevant reasons and further informed that the amount paid by the complainant is for two persons; that Opposite Party No.2 changed the travel schedule without knowledge of the complainant; that the opposite parties played fraud on the complainant; that a legal notice was issued dated 01.09.2012 but there was no answer from the opposite parties; that the complainant suffered huge monetary loss and was forced to make alternative arrangements which costed Rs.1,00,000/-; that he also suffered mental agony which is assessed at Rs.1,00,000/-; hence, the complaint claiming Rs.2,00,000/- with costs.