Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

* The second deficiency alleged against the College is with regard to in all eleven teachers who were found to be ineligible as their signature was allegedly found to be mismatching in various documents referable to their appointment in the College and their affidavit for allotment of Teacher Code. However, all these eleven Teachers filed their affidavit before the Designated Hearing Committee confirming their signature on all the documents in question. In fact, the College also pointed out during hearing that all of them were willing to appear in person before the Designated Hearing Committee confirming their affidavit. However, the C/SCA/1292/2021 CAVORDER Designated Hearing Committee did not find it necessary. Needless to mention that once the person whose signature is doubted confirms the same, the doubt has to end. Further, the signature matching demands expertise to reach any conclusion thereon. Reliance is placed on a decision of the Apex Court in the case of Thiruvengadam Pillai V/s Navaneethammal & Anr. (2008) 4 SCC 530 - Paragraph 16.