Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

H. Directing Respondent No. 2 to 9 ensure clear separation between the persons nominated on the board of the Respondent No. 1 Company or any other person having access to Respondent No. 1 Company and its information, from any competing business including that known as Primopus, I. Restraining Respondent Nos. 2 to 9, their principals/directors, their promoters, managers, assigns, successors-in-interest, licensees, franchisees, sister concerns, representatives, servants, distributors, agents, etc.and/or any person or entity acting for them from entering into any contract of supply/ services or otherwise with the Respondent No.1 Company; J. For costs of the Petition; and K. Such further orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal is empowered to pass under Section 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 and mould reliefs as it considers fit and proper in the circumstances of the case to bring an end to the matters complained of. Interim Reliefs A. Restraining any change in shareholding, capital structure, or constitution of the board of directors of Respondent No. 1 Company without the specific leave of this Hon'ble Tribunal; B. Restraining Respondent No. 1 Company and Respondent Nos. 2 to 9 from taking any coercive actions against the Petitioners and/or Dr. Yadagiri R. Pendri;