Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

20. In these circumstances this court is of opinion that petitioners have proved their case that this accident on 16.11.2002 had taken place because of rash and negligent driving of vehicle No. HR-47-2195 by its driver in which deceased have died, as pleaded by the petitioners in their respective petitions. Hence this issue is decided in favour of petitioners against the respondents.
ISSUE NO. 2 IN PETITIN NO.158/03:
21. Petitioner no. 1 in her affidavit as PW1 deposed that deceased was her husband. He was 32 years old at the time of this accident. He was working as Safai Karamchari in Sena Bhawan, Ministry of Defence. He was earning a salary of Rs.6054/- pm. Petitioners have produced salary certificate of deceased which is Ex. CW1/J for the month of October 2002 wherein his gross salary is shown as Rs.6054/- and net payable salary after compulsory deductions is shown as Rs.3499/-. She has deposed that petitioner no.2 to 4 are sons and daughters of the deceased. She has also deposed that she had spent huge amount on his treatment for four days when he remain admitted in hospital. She had spent Rs.47,935/- on his medical treatment. However she had not produced any bill in this regard. My Ld predecessor has given observations while recording the statement of PW2, "as no original bills have been produced by the claimant hence it appears they might have claimed reimbursement from some other agency". All the petitioners were dependent on the deceased for their maintenance. She has further deposed that had he not died in this accident, he would have earned promotion in near future.

ISSUE NO.2 IN PETITION NO.160/03

37. Petitioner no. 1 in her affidavit as PW1 deposed that deceased was her husband. He was 45 years of age at the time of this accident. He was working as Safai Karamchari in Sena Bhawan, Ministry of Defence. He was earning a salary Rs.6706/-pm. Petitioners have produced salary certificate of deceased which is Ex. CW1/G for the month of November 2002 wherein his gross salary is shown as Rs.6706/- and net payable salary after compulsory deductions is shown as Rs.5651/-. She has deposed that petitioner no.2 to 4 are sons and daughter of the deceased. All the petitioners were dependent on the deceased for their maintenance. She has further deposed that had he not died in this accident, he would have earned promotion in near future.