Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: mathadi worker in Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. ... vs Yogesh Vinayak Tipre on 9 May, 2024Matching Fragments
15) Plaintiff gave reply to the show cause notice on 1 July 1999 and in which he stated as under:
"You have observed that, from 14.48 p.m. to 16.40 p.m. this observation ----- is correct but I was available in Canteen from 15.00 p.m. to 15.30 p.m. to have a tea & snacks & from 15.40 p.m. to 16.24 p.m. I was in A/C.s Dept. discussing with my Superiors, as I was hungry & during shift change time, a relative had come to see me. I have not kept the work in abeyance deliberately & delay the dispatches. Also, it was not my intention to put the Company in monetary loss & to keep the Mathadi worker idle. As I had taken 18 to 19 numbers of trucks approximately inside for loading, out of which they had loaded 12 numbers of trucks in first shift, out of 12 loaded trucks, 4 loaded trucks, came for weighment at weighbridge. The remaining trucks were busy in tying tarpaulin in between warehouse to weighbridge.