Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
"As per the Hon’ble Supreme Court Judgment
reported in 19 VST 239 to claim sales under E1
sales, the first leg of transaction should necessarily
be an interstate sales transactions. The transactions
between the appellant dealers and their buyer
situated in this State is local sales with local C form
it is neither an E1 sales nor an interstates sales. In
view of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of
A&C Projects And Technologies Ltd. Vs. State of
http://www.judis.nic.in
Judgt. dt. 22.9.2020 in T.C.52 of 2016
National Engg. Industries v. State of TN
Karnataka reported in 019 VST 0239 has held that to
qualify of E1 transaction exemption the first
transaction should be an interstate transactions. i.e
there shall be movement of goods from one state to
another in respect of the first transactions. In the
instant case both the dealers reside in the State of
Tamil Nadu and transactions is between the two
Tamil Nadu dealers, such transactions effected
before crossing the State boundary. Hence the
Central Sales Tax Act would apply only when
there is two States involved or continue to
involve. Here the first transaction there was no
two States involved. Sales invoices are made to
above Tamil Nadu dealers also as interstate sales by
collecting CST @ 4% for the above transactions the
dealer received C forms issued by the Tamil Nadu
Dealers. The appellant dealers wrongly claimed local
sales as interstate sales and availed concessional
rate of tax at 4% against C form. For the
transactions the dealers have used the C forms
issued by the dealers situated within Tamil Nadu. As
http://www.judis.nic.in
Judgt. dt. 22.9.2020 in T.C.52 of 2016
National Engg. Industries v. State of TN
per section 8(4) of the Central Sales Tax Act 1956
Act 1956, C forms can be issued for any sale in
course of inter-state trade or commerce whereas,
sales between the parties situated within the same
State without any existence of interstate movement
preceding the sale is only a local sales and C forms
cannot be issued for such local sales.
Thus it is evident from the above-that as long
as the transactions were effected within this State
without actual movement of goods to another State
at the start of first transaction it is liable to tax under
the local TNGST Act only and the subsequent
interstate sales made by you is an interstate sales
liable to tax at 4% with C form and at 10% without C
forms. It is immaterial on the final destination of the
goods moved. In simple terms the first leg of
transaction should be interstate transaction to qualify
for assessment under Central Sales Tax 1956. Hence
the claim interstate sales between two buyers
residing within the State by issuing C forms
pertaining to the same State is incorrect. These
http://www.judis.nic.in
Judgt. dt. 22.9.2020 in T.C.52 of 2016
National Engg. Industries v. State of TN
transactions are nothing but local sales assessable
under the TNGST Act only.