Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: RAM NAIK in Prabhat Bora vs State Of Assam on 4 September, 2002Matching Fragments
8. 2001 (2) GLT 600 (Abdul Haque Mazumdar v. State of Assam) where it was held by this Court that incomplete chain of events the accused entitled to benefits of doubt.
9. AIR 2001 SCC 164 (Surendra Pratap Chauhari v. Ram Naik and Ors.). That was the case where evidence of eye witness was believed by the Supreme Court because relation between accused and complainant strained leading to groupism in village and the evidence of the eye witnesses who were caste fellows of complainant but even such situation, the Supreme Court pointed out that the evidence of the eye witnesses cannot be discarded and the accused was given benefit of doubt.