Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
28. In view of what is stated hereinabove, the High Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ordinarily cannot suspend the sentence by granting parole, furlough or bail to an accused convicted of an offence under the TADA Act.
Thus, it is observed that the remedy is to approach the Hon'ble Apex Court, and if the High Court entertains such an application for parole, i.e. suspension of sentence, or if the High Court entertains the bail application invoking extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, then, the very scheme and object of the Act and the intendment of the Parliament would be completely defeated and frustrated.