Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: manual guidelines in G.Sampath Kumar vs State Of Tamil NaduMatching Fragments
Whether CBCID Manual Guidelines are violated
25. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that without proper preliminary enquiry the case has been registered against a public servant contrary to the CBCID Manual guidelines is factually not correct. Initially complaint was only against Mahendra Singh Ranka (A.1). The said complaint was received on 26.6.2013 and registered immediately. At that time neither the petitioner nor others were suspected as accused and during the course of investigation, they have stumbled upon materials indicating involvement of public servant, immediately the higher officials have been informed and necessary permission has been obtained from Director General of Police on 15.4.2014 to proceed and thereafter, further investigation has continued. While the fact being so, this court finds no violation of CBCID Manual guidelines as contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner.