Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
CIC/SA/A/2014/001881
3. Appellant through his RTI application had sought action taken report on his Complaint dated 24.03.2014 regarding encouragement of touts by Mr Tyagi, Testing Officer of North Zonal Office, Mall road. Having received no information within the prescribed period, the appellant had filed First Appeal on 20.08.2014. FAA by his Order dated 05.11.2014 directed the PIO to give proper reply under his signature and if the reply is filed, the appellant is to go CIC/SA/A/2014/001880, 1881, 1882, 1883 & 1918 Page 2 through and further come forward if not satisfied. Claiming noncompliance of FAA Order, the appellant has approached the Commission in Second Appeal. CIC/SA/A/2014/001882
CIC/SA/A/2014/001881
9. The appellant submitted that he had made a complaint against the Testing Officer Mr. Tyagi who was encouraging the touts for securing the driving licence. But so far he had not received the information. In response to this, the respondent authority submitted that they have reported this matter to the SHO, Timarpur on 12102014 and the SHO has posted the beat officers who are making efforts to remove the touts. But the appellant specifically referred to one tout namely Ravi Kumar and action taken on him. The Commission, therefore, directs the PIO to furnish the action taken report to the appellant, on Ravi Kumar who is acting as tout within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. The Commission also directs the PIO to show cause why penalty cannot be imposed for noncompliance of FAA order dated 2082014 within the prescribed period. His explanation should reach the Commission within 21 days from the date of receipt of this order.