Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Learned counsel, appearing for petitioners submits that as a matter of fact, the original plaintiff, namely, Jagdish Lohar was an illiterate person and he was not aware about the actual position of the ancestral plots and similarly, petitioner No. 1, who happens to be wife of original plaintiff, Jagdish Lohar, is also an illiterate lady and she could not disclose the actual state of affairs in respect of plots, in question, at the time of drafting of the plaint, as a result thereof, the concerned lawyer committed several errors in drafting the plaint but when the respondents were examined in course of trial, it came to light that several plots had already been sold by respondents and, thereafter, the petitioners filed amendment petition for correction of area of the disputed plots and also claimed their right in respect of disputed plots.