Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

12. According to respondents, petitioner should not be allowed to take advantage of his own wrong. It is also contended that the seats in M. Pharm course are limited and it is not only the form of the petitioner which was not considered for incomplete information but there are many other candidates whose applications have not been considered for giving incomplete information and in the circumstances the petitioner is not entitled for any relief.

13. In reply to the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, in the rejoinder, petitioner contended that respondents with malafide intention and to overcome the legal claim of the petitioner has destroyed the document of the petitioner and, therefore, the respondents are guilty of destruction of the evidence.

16. I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have perused the petition, counter affidavit and the rejoinder. It is not disputed that the petitioner did not fill his GATE Score in the admission form. The contention of the petitioner is that he had annexed a copy of the GATE score card along with the application form which fact has been emphatically denied by respondents who have produced a copy of the admission form. Original admission form along with annexure attached by the petitioner was also produced which shows that the petitioner had not annexed copy of the GATE score card along with his admission form. The petitioner has rather alleged that the respondents have destroyed the document of the petitioner with a view to justify their stand of not considering the candidature of the petitioner.