Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

19. It has been submitted by learned counsel of the petitioner that he has facing six trial regarding the same offence and all data of six cases were saved in one heard disc. Therefor the contention of the learned counsel of the NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:56915 9 MCRC-4510-2025 CBI should not be acceptable regarding the data of other exam which is also saved in hard disc. On other hand it is objected that other data which is related to other cases has already been provided in other cases which cannot claimed in this case. In our opinion the relevant data available in hard disc has been provided to accused with hash value therefore no need to provide clone of the hard disc. Secondly there is no dispute regarding the source code of the software therefor no need to clone of the hard disc to disprove the source code of the original software. In Tyagi case there is a dispute of stolen of sources code of complainant software and prepared other software for sailing by accused. in above case accused raised a defence he used own sources code, he never used complainant software source code , to prove his defence, clone of hard disc is required. on the above facts of the case Tyagi case is not help to get a clone of hard disc. The above case square not applied in present cases. Soft copy of the hard disc and scanner had already be given to the petitioner which his full compliance of the provision of the section 208 Cr.P.C.