Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: common plot in Balaji Tower Co-Op Hou. Soc. Ltd. And Anr vs The State Of Maha. Thr. Sec. Co-Op Dept. ... on 11 November, 2025Matching Fragments
16. I have considered the material placed on record, the submissions of the parties, and the statutory scheme under Sections 17 and 18 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
17. The material placed on record establishes a clear factual position. Petitioner No.1 society is situated on Plot No.8. Respondent No.4 is situated on Plot No.1. The distance between the two plots is more than one kilometre. There is no common internal road or entrance connecting both plots. Each plot functions as an independent block.
24. On the touchstone of collective welfare, the separation will benefit the members. Members of Balaji Tower will be able to manage maintenance, accounts, and decisions without dependence on a managing committee which is physically distant and functionally disconnected from them. There are no common amenities whose loss will prejudice other members. The two plots do not have a common gate, common security, or common services. There is no evidence that bifurcation will deprive respondent No.4 of contribution needed for shared facilities.