Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: secondary school code in Azmatunnisa Abdul Khalique vs The State Of Maharashtra on 8 February, 2010Matching Fragments
There the issue was between the provisions of the Secondary Schools Code and the provisions of the Maharahtra Secondary Education Boards Regulations. The area where the school was located was earlier forming a part of the State of Madhya Pradesh which was governed by the Grant-in-Code. On the States Reorganization, some of the districts were included in the State of Bombay which is now the State of Maharashtra. The issue pertained to the age of retirement requirement. Whereas under the provisions of the Regulations, superannuation was at the age 60, in the terms of Code it was 58. The issue was whether the Code had a statutory recognition. In that context, the Supreme Court noted that the provisions of the Maharashtra Act and the Maharashtra Regulations gave statutory recognition to the Code.