Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. The commission, having examined the contents of complaint, affidavit evidence of complainant and Ex-C1 to C11 now Commission to decide the case on the alleged deficiency in service on the part of OPs 1 to 5.
4. It is found from the proceedings that OPs were in judicial custody for some time and it is not known about their whereabouts, since they failed to actively participate before this commission. In such circumstances, considering the contents of complaint, affidavit evidence being reiteration of the contents of complaint which being supported by Ex-C1 to C11, complainant has to be held proved alleged deficiency in service on the part of OPs. If we examined the documents placed on record are establishing about the payments of Rs.24,07,500/- made to the OPs in respect of an apartment in pre-launch project which is never completed and the amount paid by the complainant having been utilized by Ops never been returned. In such circumstances, complainants having been invested their hard earned money are be held entitle for interest, had they invested such money in any other project could have acquired similar such Flat or property. In such circumstances the OP are held liable to pay interest as claimed at 18% per annum from 06.06.2017 to meet the ends of justice.