Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: unsigned statement in Pueblo Holdings Limited vs Emirates Trading Agency LlcMatching Fragments
18. Mr.Giridharan submitted that the financial statements, which refer to beneficial interest, are unsigned. His next contention was that Section 89 of CA 2013 applies and that the Award Holder cannot be in a _____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis better position than the Award Debtor with regard to non-compliance with Section 89. It was reiterated that the saleable interest criterion in Section 60 CPC is not satisfied. Mr.Giridharan further submitted that the present EP constitutes an abuse of process and that the documents on record establish collusion between the Award Holder and the Al Ghurair group.