Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Traffic apprentice in Surendra Nath Pandey vs M/O Railways on 6 December, 2018Matching Fragments
d. issue any other order or direction as the Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
e. award cost of this application to the applicant."
2. The applicant was first appointed as Traffic Apprentice and after three years of qualifying training, was appointed on 23.4.1968 as Assistant Yard Master. He was promoted in the usual channel of promotion for Class III employees. At the time of his promotion to Group B post, there was some problem for which the applicant had to approach the Tribunal by filing an OA, after which he was allowed to participate in the qualifying examination. Eventually he was promoted to Group B on 7.10.1989 with notional benefits from 21.1.1987. Then on 12.6.1996, the applicant was allowed officiating promotion to the Group A senior scale post after being considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee (in short DPC) under para 214 (b) of the Indian Railway Establishment Code (in short IREC) Volume I. His promotion to Group A post was antedated to 1.12.1995 taking into account promotion of another employee, junior to the applicant, but he was not allowed regular promotion.