Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

(17). Thus, it is seen that the Judges of the Supreme Court of India and High Courts are constitutional functionaries and are discharging sovereign functions of administration of justice and none of them is in public employment. It has been held in the case of All India Judges' Association and others vs. Union of India (supra) that the Judicial Service is not service in the sense of employment and that the Judges are not employees. As members of the judiciary they exercise the sovereign judicial power of the State. They are holders of public officers in the same way as the members of the council of ministers and the members of the legislature and that there cannot be a link between the service conditions of the Judges and those of members of the other services. The appellant has contended that Article 16 of the Constitution is attracted in the case of appointment of Judges. Such contention, in our opinion, is fallacious. Article 16(1) reads that there shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State. The appointment of a Judge of the Supreme Court or High Court is neither an employment nor an appointment of any office under the State but it is an independent constitutional functions discharged by the persons so appointed and it is certainly not an appointment to in office under the State. Clauses (1) & (2) of Article 16 guaranteed equality of opportunity to all citizens in the matter of appointment to any office or of any other employment under the State. Clauses (3) to (5) however, lay down exceptions to the above rule of equal opportunity.