Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

6. During the inspection, the District Legal Metrology Officer-P Satyanarayana, seized 2 defective packages from A7, out of the 244, and the remaining 242 packages were kept under safe custody in the premises under S.15 of the Act, under the cover of a panchanama in the presence of mediators LWs 3 and 4. A copy of the same was handed over to A7 on the spot with proper acknowledgment.

7. The complaint also specifies that, prior to the filing of the complaint, Notice No. 147/PC/2018-19 dated 3.7.2018 was served on the Company-M/s Instakart, through an e-mail. The Company replied to the notice on 19.12.2018, stating that the seizure report had already been sent to the concerned Brand/Seller/Manufacturer, and that in terms of Rule 18(1) of the Rules, 2011, the concerned Brand/Seller/Manufacturer is responsible. The Company also requested the withdrawal of the notice and for no further action to be taken against the Company and its Directors. The Company's request was rejected vide Office Letter No. 142/PC/2018-19 dated 26.12.2018. Thereafter, the complaint was filed in the Court.