Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
13. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
VINOD G. ASRANI vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
reported in (2007) 3 SCC 633 was examining as
to whether non inclusion of petitioner's name in
- 27 -
the approval under Section 23(1)(a) of MCOCA
(analogous provision to Section 23(1)(a) of
KCOCA was fatal to the investigation or not?
and found that in the facts obtained in the said
case though petitioner's name was not included
in the approval granted under Section 23(1)(a)
MCOCA, while granting sanction, his name had
been included under Section 23(2) after the
stage of investigation into the complaint, since
his complicity was established during the course
of such investigation. It has been held:
"8. We have carefully considered
the submissions made on behalf of the
respective parties and the relevant
provisions of MCOCA and we are of the
view that the High Court did not
commit any error in dismissing the
petitioner's writ application. We are
inclined to accept Mr. Altaf Ahmed's
submissions that non-inclusion of the
petitioner's name in the approval
under Section 23(1)(a) of MCOCA was
not fatal to the investigation as far as
the petitioner is concerned. On the
other hand, his name was included in
- 29 -
and file charge-sheet against whoever
is found during the investigation to
have been involved in the commission
of such offence. There is no hard-and-
fast rule that the first information
report must always contain the names
of all persons who were involved in the
commission of an offence. Very often
the names of the culprits are not even
mentioned in the FIR and they surface
only at the stage of the investigation.
The scheme under Section 23 of
MCOCA is similar and Section 23(1)(a)
provides a safeguard that no
investigation into an offence under
MCOCA should be commenced without
the approval of the authorities
concerned. Once such approval is
obtained, an investigation is
commenced. Those who are
subsequently found to be involved in
the commission of the organized crime
can very well be proceeded against
once sanction is obtained against them
under Section 23(2) of MCOCA."