Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: pharmacy in Shri Ramnath Singh Shiksha Prasar ... vs Pharmacy Council Of India on 1 October, 2014Matching Fragments
3. Inspection of the petitioner institution was conducted on 6.4.2009 and the inspectors specifically pointed out following deficiencies :-
2 W.P.No.7414/2013"a) Staff with M.Pharma (Pharmacy Practice) specialization is yet to join to college.
b) Pharmacy Practice Department is yet to commence its activities in the hospital and the space for Pharmacy Practice Deptt. in the hospital was inadequate.
b) non-compliance of Pharm.D.Regulations regarding appointment of pharmacy practice staff.
c) non-submission of affiliation/consent of the Examining Authority."
5. A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner institution. Reply of the same was submited. However, as per the respondents the petitioner did not fulfill the requirement.
6. Another complaint was received against the petitioner institution and thereafter a team of four experts conducted surprise inspection of the petitioner institution on 27th and 28th October 2009. The inspecting team submitted report pointing out following deficiencies :-
a) instead of having MOU with 300 bedded hospital as required under Appendix-B of Pharm.D.Regulations, 2008, the institution tied up with 2 hospitals with 150 beds each (Nursing Home and Hospital) which is not permissible under Pharm.D.Regulations.
b) one more teaching staff with Pharmacy Practice specialization in PG is to be appointed.
c) Pharmacy Practice Department is only identified but not established.
d) facilities should be available for proper training of the students."
9. In view of the above, the respondents had taken a decision to stick to its earlier decision that the institution shall not admit the students from 2009-10 academic session. Thereafter the petitioner institution submitted a letter on 3.7.2011 informing the respondents that it had a MOU with 300 beds hospital and appointment of Pharmacy practice staff. Thereafter a surprise inspection was conducted on 5th & 6th August 2011 and the report was considered by the respondents in its meeting held in August 2011 and following decisions have been taken :-