Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: RAM NAIK in State By Cbi/Acb vs A-1) J. Kannan on 16 December, 2015Matching Fragments
The Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB Bengaluru has submitted a charge sheet against the above accused No.1 to 3 for the offences punishable under Sec. 120B r/w 420, 409, 467, 468, 471, 477A of IPC and Sec. 13(2) r/w 13(1) (c) & (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that: -
(a) The accused No.1 J. Kannan was working as Assistant Manager, Syndicate Bank, Yeshwanthpur Branch,
3 Spl.C.C.253/13 J Bangalore from August 2009 to 30.10.2012 and a public servant and during his tenure of service in the said branch holding the advances portfolio. Accused No.2 J. Muralidharan S/o Jothimurugan is a private person and the brother of Accused No.1, unemployed, and staying with his parents at Madurai, Tamil Nadu. Accused No.3 Ram Naik was working as Chief Manager and Head of Syndicate Bank, Yeshwanthpur Branch, Bangalore, from 13.01.2010 to 29.10.2012 and a public servant.
36 Spl.C.C.253/13 J (2) Looking to the defence of all the accused, it is an admitted fact that accused No.1 J. Kannan was working as Asst. Manager, Syndicate Bank, Yeshwanthpur Branch, Bangalore from August 2009 to 30.10.2012 and holding the advances portfolio in the said branch. It is further admitted that accused No.2 J. Muralidharan is the own younger brother of accused No.1 and student and resident of Madurai, Tamilnadu and a private person. It is further admitted that accused No.3 Ram Naik was working as Chief Manager and head of Yeshwanthpura Branch, Syndicate Bank, Bangalore from 13.1.2010 to 29.10.2012 and subsequently he was transferred to the Syndicate Bank, Regional Office-II, Bangalore and retired from the service on superannuation on 30.4.2013. It is further admitted that subsequently, accused No.1 and 3 have been dismissed from the service by holding Departmental Enquiry by the Syndicate Bank.