Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

I for preparation of minimum APIs reads as follows:-

V Expert Screening Screening Selection Selection Expert Assessment Committee Committee Committee Committee Committee System Percentage No No 30% 50% 50% Distribution separate separate Contribution Contribution Contribution of points. points. to Research to Research to Research Weightage Screening Screening 50% 30% 50% Points in the Committee Committee Assessment Assessment Performance Expert to verify to verify of domain of domain evaluation Assessment API scores API scores knowledge knowledge and other (Total and teaching and teaching credential by weightage practices. practices referral

4.18. With regard to the award of API score, it is contended that award of API Score is only for the purpose of making eligible the candidates to took the interview. Since Petitioners were allowed to take part in the interview basing on the API score awarded to them, no challenge can be made that such marks awarded is not in conformity with the API score prescribed in Table I of AICTE Regulation, 2012.

// 24 // 4.19. It is also contended that after getting the benefit of promotion vide order under Annexure-8, while Opp. Party No. 5 has retired from service in the meantime, Opp. Party No. 6 has been transferred to another Department on availing further benefit of promotion. Since Opp. Party Nos. 5 & 6 after getting the benefit of promotion have retired and/or have got further promotion, any interference to their promotion at this stage will cause them prejudice and it is not in the interest of justice. It is accordingly contended that no illegality or irregularity is there with regard to constitution of the Selection Committee and promotion of Private Opp. Party Nos. 5 & 6 to the rank of Professor vide order under Annexure-8.