Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

20. The learned Rent Controller after referring to the provisions of the Act held that the proper provision under which the eviction petition should have been filed is under Section 10(3)(a)(iii)(a) of the Act and that instead of quoting (a) of sub-clause (iii), the petitioner quoted (b) to sub-clause (iii) and that the misquoting of the section need not be taken serious view and it will not affect the spirit of the pleadings of the petitioners in R.C.C.No. 236 of 1972. The learned Rent Controller rightly held that the pleadings as such, should be taken into consideration for a just decision of the case. I, therefore, agree with the observation of the learned Rent Controller that the eviction petition should not fail on the ground of misquoting of the proper provision of law.