Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

"East: Property No. 128 and property of others.
West: G.T. Road.
North: 20ft. Wide street.
South: 20ft. wide street, after the other property of petitioners."

2. It was further alleged that the premises in dispute had been let out to the Judgment-Debtor at the rate of Rs. 700/- per month by creating a single tenancy.

3. After the order of ejectment attained finality, decree-holders filed an application for execution of the decree. In response to the same, decree-holder vacated a portion of the tenanted premises. Qua the remaining portion, an objection was taken that no decree had been passed as there was no prayer of the decree-holders to get the judgment-debtor evicted from the said portion. Objection filed by the judgment-debtor were dismissed, against which the present revision petition has been filed by the judgment-debtor.

7. In view of the findings recorded in the ejectment petition, the point raised by the judgment debtor in the execution does not merit any serious consideration. The findings recorded in the ejectment petition are clear and unambiguous and the judgment-debtor is liable to be evicted from the entire premises which were let out to it by Smt. Bhagwanti, mother of the decree-holders. This petition has, therefore, no force and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs. Judgment-debtor is, however, granted a period of two months to vacate the premises and hand over the vacant possession of the same to the decree-holders subject to the condition that it pays/deposits all arrears of rent due upto 31.7.1995 on or before 31.8.1995 and also pays/deposits the rent for the next two months in advance by the said date.