Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4. Consideration:-

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the case record. Our observations are as under:-
4(i). Point No.1:-
Learned counsel for the appellants invited attention to Clause (viii) of para-III of the R&R Scheme for Chamera Hydroelectric Project Stage-II, which reads as under:-
"(viii) No person shall be eligible for employment in the Project, who is not entered as member of the concerned affected family in the Panchayat Parivar Register."

It was contended that the entry existing in the Panchayat Parivar Register, reflecting respondent No.1 S/o respondent No.2 as member of respondent No.2's family and resident of Village Gurad, was fake; Respondent No.2 had not been living in Village Gurad, therefore, he could not have been taken to be the member of the family of his father, i.e. respondent No.2, and .

resident of Village Gurad.

We are afraid the above argument is not even available to the appellants. Admittedly, there exists an entry in the Panchayat Priwar Register in favour of respondent No.1, being son of of respondent No.2 and residing with his family in Village Gurad. The appellants have admittedly not laid any challenge to the entry. It is rt not for the appellants to decide on their own that the entry existing in the Panchayat Parivar Register is fake and is not to be acted upon. Name of respondent No.1 is recorded in the concerned Panchayat Parivar Register. He, therefore, does not suffer from disqualification for availing the benefits of the R&R Scheme of Chamera HEP Stage-II. The appellants have not even demonstrated as to how the entry of respondent No.1 in the Panchayat Parivar Register as member of the family of respondent No.2 can be said to be fake.