Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: loudspeaker in Shri Arvind Kumar Tyagi vs Shri Mohit Parashar on 25 April, 2023Matching Fragments
(iii) On 04.04.2022 at around 10:00 a.m., the loudspeakers was in high volume in the said temple, due to which the children of the school were upset. The appellant requested the respondents to turn off the loudspeaker but the respondents did not pay any heed. The respondent no. 1 called his friends i.e. respondent no. 2 and 3. They brought there acquaintances along with them. The respondent nos. 3 told that this loud speaker will run like this in full volume and they do not believe in the court etc. The respondent no. 2 also reiterated the same point and threatened the appellant/plaintiff. The appellant finding himself surrounded, the called PCR on 112 number and PCR Van reached there and the policeman saved the appellant from the crowd and sent him to the police station.
(iv) In the premises of police station, ASI Shri Praveen also explained in the police station that the use of loudspeakers is prohibited. At his behest, the respondents promised that they would not use the loudspeakers. Thereafter, on the next date i.e. 05.04.2022, loudspeakers were used in the school hours from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. On being reminded of the promise of yesterday, the respondent repeated the same thing as the previous day and said that they would stop running the school and will make it difficult for the teachers and children to leave the street.
(j) The Learned Trial Court did not consider the fact that in this temple, the loudspeakers are used in high volume defying the orders of the Supreme Court.
(k) The Learned Trial Court did not consider the fact that on 04.04.2022 at around 10:00 am, the loudspeakers were being used in high volume in the said temple, due to this reason the children of the school were upset.
(l) The Learned Trial Court did not consider the fact that the appellant requested the respondents to turn off the loudspeaker but the respondents did not pay any heed. The respondent no. 1 called his friends i.e. the respondent no. 2 and 3 and they brought their acquaintances alongwith them. The respondent no. 3 told that this loudspeaker will run like this in full volume, they don't believe in court etc.
(m) The Learned Trial Court did not consider the fact that in the premises of police station ASI Shri Praveen also explained tin the police station that the use of loudspeakers is prohibited. At his behest, the respondents came promising not to use loudspeakers.
(n) The Learned Trial Court did not consider the fact that on 05.04.2022, loudspeakers were used in the school hours from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. On being reminded of the promise the respondent repeated the same thing as the previous day and said that they would stop running your school and will make it difficult for your teachers and children to leave the street.