Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: erectile dysfunction in Sunkari Kishan vs The State Of Ap.Rep By Pp.,Hc.,Hyd on 20 October, 2022Matching Fragments
37. P.W.8 is the Civil Assistant Surgeon in Government Hospital, Sircilla and he examined the accused and opined vide Ex.P‐5 that there is no evidence to suggest that there is any erectile dysfunction. This shows that the accused is potent.
38. P.W.10 is the Civil Assistant Surgeon, who examined the victim girl on 17.11.2009 at 12.10 p.m. and issued preliminary report Ex.P‐7 certificate. The veginal washings and veginal sphere were sent to FSL report for chemical examination and Ex.P‐6 is the FSL report. The contents of the said report, were extracted above, while noting the evidence of P.W.10. A perusal of FSL report, shows that human semen and spermatozoa are detected on item No.5, which is a red black and white coloured designed underwear, and semen is also detected on item No.3, which is the cream and red coloured frock.