Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

7. The petitioner submitted that based on the API score and also PBAS, the petitioner is more meritorious than the third respondent in all aspects. The petitioner has published more books, research papers and articles than the third respondent. The third respondent is not at all qualified and not https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis having minimum qualification. Moreover, the petitioner has done her research work in Sangam Literature, which is a preferential criteria stated in the advertisement. The petitioner has served as Editor, who edited and published the Research Paper series in 9 volumes in the year 2015. The petitioner conducted various seminars, workshops, endowment lectures on various topics. The petitioner is more meritorious than the third respondent. In spite of the same, the petitioner was not granted any appointment. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has filed this writ petition and the petitioner has raised various other grounds and prayed to allow the writ petition.

10. The third respondent is having ten years experience. The petitioner was appointed as Lecturer / Assistant Professor on 25.06.2007 and the said service was considered and similarly the service of the third respondent as Lecturer from 27.07.2005 has been considered and the third respondent has longer service than the petitioner as a Lecturer and hence, the third respondent has been rightly selected as per service which is in accordance with Clause-10.1 of UGC Regulations 2010. Guiding of M.Phil. and Ph.D. students is not the only criteria for appointment to the post of Professor as per UGC guidelines. The publications made and various other accomplishments of the candidates including the petitioner has been https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis considered to calculate API score based on PBAS as per UGC Regulations 2010. The percentage for possessing the qualification for selection are given as under: