Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

8. This brings me to the other grounds urged by respondent No. 2 and the interveners to refuse relief to the petitioners. Firstly, it is submitted that the claim for an interim injunction is premature. Respondent No. 2 has given a notice of a meeting to discuss the vote of no confidence. For ought we know the general body may reject the motion of no confidence. It may re-affirm its confidence in the Board and it may go further, and on a preliminary motion, refuse to permit even a discussion on the no confidence. In shutting out the very consideration of the motion of no confidence, petitioners are actuated by mala fides. They cannot be allowed to stifle free speech and it is a fundamental right of the ordinary members to deliberate and rule upon a motion expressing lack of confidence in the Board. Basically this argument boils down to the plea of prematurity in the filing of the petition. In seeking to discuss the motion of in confidence, opponents of the petitioners rely upon Bye-law No. 34(C). Under this bye-law, the matter does not end by the mere passing of the resolution. Once a resolution of no confidence is carried by a simple majority, the Board goes out of office and a new Board goes out of office and a new Board can be elected. It is difficult to know how the bridge between the two area is to be spanned. Be that as it may, if recourse is being had to Bye-law No. 34(C), it cannot be said that the petition moved is premature. This is the stage at which the vires of the Bye-law has to be decided. If action proposed to be taken be ultra vires, it has to be checked at the very inception. Next, it was contended that until the statutory courts look into the matter closely and accede to the claim of a declaration made by the petitioners, it will not be in order to issue an injunction. The fact that a declaration is claimed and the relief of declaration is prospective in application, does not mean that an injunction should be refused where the Court cannot but accede to the request for a declaration-albeit the final declaration-albeit the final decision there on, has to be relegated to a later stage of the proceeding.