Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
21. In the given facts, there is a clear lack of `due diligence'
and the mistake committed certainly does not come within the
preview of a typographical error. The term "typographical
error" is defined as a mistake made in the printed/typed
material during a printing/typing process. The term includes
errors due to mechanical failure or slips of the hand or finger,
but usually excludes errors of ignorance. Therefore, the act of
neglecting to perform an action which one has an obligation to
do cannot be called as a typographical error. As a consequence
the plea of typographical error cannot be entertained in this
regard since the situation is of lack of due diligence wherein
such amendment is impliedly barred under the Code.
22. The claim of typographical error/mistake is baseless and
cannot be accepted. In fact, had the person who prepared the
plaint, signed and verified the plaint showed some attention,
this omission could have been noticed and rectified there itself.
In such circumstances, it cannot be construed that due
diligence was adhered to and in any event, omission of
mandatory requirement running into 3 to 4 sentences cannot
be a typographical error as claimed by the plaintiffs. All these
aspects have been rightly considered and concluded by the trial
court and the High Court has committed an error in accepting
the explanation that it was a typographical error to mention
and it was an accidental slip.