Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: TINDIVANAM in Venkatraman vs The State Represented By on 14 March, 2025Matching Fragments
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the judgment dated 21.02.2025 passed in Criminal Appeal No.51 of 2024 by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tindivanam confirming the order dated 20.09.2024 passed in C.C.No.236 of 2013 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II,Tindivanam.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent- Police and perused the materials available on record.
3. The petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition against the judgment dated 21.02.2025 passed in Criminal Appeal No.51 of 2024 by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tindivanam confirming the order dated 20.09.2024 passed in C.C.No.236 of 2013 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II,Tindivanam. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/03/2025 06:51:42 pm )
4. The respondent-Police registered a case against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 279, 337 IPC(13 counts), 338 IPC (8 counts) and 304(A) IPC. After completion of investigation, laid a charge sheet before the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II,Tindivanam. After completion of trial, the trial court convicted the petitioner and imposed fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 279 IPC and fine of Rs.500/- (Rs.500 x 13 = Rs.6,500/-) for the offence under Section 337 IPC (13 counts) and fine of Rs.1,000/- (8 x Rs.1,000 = Rs.8,000) for the offence under Section 338 of IPC (8 counts), in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two weeks for each offences and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and imposed fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence under Section 304(A) IPC, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. Aggrieved by the order of the trial court, the petitioner has filed Criminal Appeal No.51 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Court, Tindivanam. The appellate Court, after hearing the appeal, dismissed the same and confirmed the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/03/2025 06:51:42 pm ) Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition.
1. The I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tindivanam.
2. The Judicial Magistrate No.II,Tindivanam.
3. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Marakanam Police Station , Villupuram District.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.
5. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cuddalore.