Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

20. At the very outset, we must dispel Mr. Sushil Kumar's rather broad argument that the primary allegations were of rape whereas murder was a secondary issue in the facts of the case and that the Crl. Appeal No.87 of proof of murder would depend on proof of rape. We see from the record that there is very substantial evidence with regard to the allegations of murder simpliciter and have been dealt with under circumstance No.11.