Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

10. The learned counsel for Sri.A.S.Ramakrishnan fervently argued and resisted the contentions raised by the learned counsel for Sri.A.S.Balasubramanian. According to the learned counsel for Sri.A.S.Ramakrishnan, the parents of Sri.A.S.Ramakrishnan duly executed the sale deed marked as Ext.A1 in favour of Sri.A.S.Ramakrishnan for valid consideration. and immediately thereafter, as per Ext.A2, Sri.A.S.Ramakrishnan mutated the property in his favour and he also produced RSA NO. 158 OF 2005 certificate showing possession of the property and the same has been issued by the Village Officer, which is produced as Ext.A3. It is pointed out by the learned counsel further that, when the parents sold the plaint schedule property in favour of Sri.A.S.Ramakrishnan, Sri.A.S.Balasubramanian in collusion with the 2nd defendant created an agreement with backdate before the date of Ext.A1 and on the basis of the said agreement, suit for specific performance as O.S.No.33/1999 was filed before the Sub Court, Palakkad, and the same was dismissed.