Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1.  Plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of Rs. 75,83,700/­ alongwith future and pendente lite interest @ 15% per annum against the defendants.   

2. Adumbrated in brief the facts of the case of plaintiff are : 

Plaintiff   is   a   proprietorship   firm   and   has   been   working   as   a delar/Authorised   Business   Associate   of   the   defendant   no.1.
CS - 516/17 M/s. Bhagirath Communications Vs. Ricoh India Ltd. & Ors. page 2 of 21 Defendant   no.1   is   engaged   in   the   manufacturing   of   Colour Multifunction Printers, Black and White Multi function printers, Mono and Colour Laser Printers and Copy Printers.  Defendants no.2   to   5   are   jointly   and   collectively   responsible   for   all   the working,   decision   making   and   operations   on   behalf   of   the defendant no.1. The dealer agreement dated 01.04.1999 was for a period of 1 year and was renewable after the initial period at the option of the defendant company.  The work of the plaintiff was appreciated by the defendant company.   It is averred that the  plaintiff   had  spent   a   huge   amount   of   money   in   terms   of trained service engineers, trained sales staff, accountant, back office staff, furniture etc. as per the specific designs/requirement of the defendant no.1.  The plaintiff also spent huge amount of money for the advertisement/sales promotion of the products of the defendant no.1.  The plaintiff played a major role in building the brand name and developing the goodwill of the defendant no.1 at Sangli District.