Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

16.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/second defendant has befittingly drawn the attention of the Court to the decision reported in 2003(1) CTC 539 (M.Manoharadhas Vs. C.Arumughaperumal Pillai and another) wherein this Court has held at Paragraph-8 that the suit property is situate in Kanyakumari District i.e., within the jurisdiction of Sub-Registrar of Nagercoil. The first defendant had executed the sale deed Ex.B1 dated 26.06.1985 at Parasalai of Kerala State. To enable such a sale, the property at S.No.80/1, Parasalai Village in Neyyartin Karai Taluk, is shown as a security. The first respondent/plaintiff has produced Ex.A6 certificate from the Tahsildar stating that the first defendant has no possession or ownership of the property situate in Survey No.80/1, which has been shown as security in Ex.B1. If no such property is in existence, it follows that Ex.B1 sale deed cannot be a valid sale.