Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

8. The points that arise for court consideration are as follows:-

1) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the accused opened a twitter account in the name of @shamiwitness in 2009, tweeted and re-tweeted on his twitter account from 25.01.2013 to 11/12.12.2014 within the jurisdiction of Gangammanagudi police station in Bengaluru in support of the claim of cession of Jammu & Kashmir from Union of India, tweeted/re-tweeted in support of terrorists who were attacking the civilians and the Indian Forces, referring to Kashmir as "Occupied Kashmir", the Indian Forces as "Occupation Forces", encouraging Muslims in India to believe that the Muslims are being attacked relentlessly by the Indian Government and there is no justice for Muslims in India, calling upon Muslims to Spl.C.No.272/2015 support the Caliphate in Jammu & Kashmir, tweeted and re-tweeted with updates with an intention to support the terrorist acts in Jammu & Kashmir, which was intended or supported a claim to bring about cession of a part of the territory of India or secession of a part of the territory of India from the Union, which disclaims, questions, disrupts and intended to disrupt the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India, causing or intending to cause disaffection against India, and to bring into hatred, or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards Government established by law in India and thereby committed the offence punishable under S.13(1)(b) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 ?

2) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that in the aforesaid place and period, the accused recruited the persons intentionally to support the banned terrorist organisation ISIL/ISIS, which was banned under the United Nations Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism (Implementation of Security Council Resolutions) Order, 2007 made under Section 2 of the United Nations (Security Council) Act, 1947, for commission of a terrorist act by willfully allowing his twitter account to become a meeting place for pro-ISIS accounts, who wanted to contact other pro-ISIS accounts and helped those Mujahirs (immigrants who came to join the ISIS) to cross the border by helping them with specific input of which border post was open and thereby committed the offence punishable under S.18-B of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 within the cognizance of this Court ?

4) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that in the aforesaid place and period, the accused tweeted and re-tweeted in support of the claim of cession of Jammu & Kashmir from the Union of India, tweeted/re- tweeted at large in support of terrorists who were attacking the civilians and the Indian Forces, referring to Kashmir as "Occupied Kashmir", the Indian Forces as "Occupation Forces", encouraging Muslims in India to believe that the Muslims are being attacked relentlessly by the Indian Government and there is no justice for Muslims in India, calling upon Muslims to support the Caliphate in Jammu & Kashmir, tweeted and re-tweeted with updates with an with intention to support the terrorist acts in Jammu & Kashmir, Spl.C.No.272/2015 which was intended or supported a claim to bring about cession of a part of the territory of India or secession of a part of the territory of India from the Union, which disclaims, questions, disrupts and intended to disrupt the sovereignty and territorial integrity of India and thereby attempted or abetted to wage war against the Government of India and committed offence punishable under S.121 of the Indian Penal Code ?

6) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that in the aforesaid place and period, the accused tweeted and re-tweeted, knowing fully well that ISIL/ISIS is a terrorist organization banned under United Nations Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism (Implementation of Security Council Resolutions) Order, 2007 made under Section 2 of the United Nations (Security Council) Act, 1947 and at war with Syria, Iraq and Iran, the States that are at peace with India, intentionally to support the ISIS in the war, tweeted and re-tweeted thousands of messages, posted pictures and videos of war to Spl.C.No.272/2015 support every terrorist act of ISIS and thereby abetted waging of war against Asiatic power in alliance and the Governments at peace with the Government of India and committed the offence punishable under S.125 of IPC ?