Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: paradhi in Mangal Munda vs Union Of India Through National ... on 12 March, 2024Matching Fragments
(vi) The ratio of judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant as rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. K.A. Najeeb (Supra), is not applicable in the instant case, reason being that in the aforesaid case, nature and background of the offence was different.
23. Mr. Das, learned counsel for the respondent-NIA based upon the aforesaid ground has submitted that since the nature of allegation leveled against the appellant is very grave and bail of identically placed accused persons namely Sorto Mahali @ Don, Ramrai Hasda, Jaiki Paradhi @ Jaiki and Suli Kandir @ Suleman Kandir, have already been rejected vide order dated 18.01.2023, 10.01.2024, and 11.01.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 399 of 2022, 1141 of 2023 and 990 of 2023 respectively, therefore, the present appeal is also fit to be dismissed. Analysis
67. It is pertinent to mention here that an application for bail (Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 399 of 2022) has been preferred by the co-accused persons namely Sorto Mahali @ Don @ Rava @Tiera Mahli (A-7) and Ramrai Hasda @ Ramrai Hansda (A-1) which has been dismissed vide order dated 18.01.2023 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
68. Further the bail applications of other co-accused persons namely Jaiki Paradhi @ Jaiki and Suli Kandir @ Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.1159 of 2022 Suleman Kandir, have already been rejected by this Court vide order dated 10.01.2024, and 11.01.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1141 of 2023 and 990 of 2023 respectively.