Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: interrogatories when allowed in Canara Bank vs Rajiv Tyagi & Associates & Anr. on 12 January, 2010Matching Fragments
13. This petition therefore succeeds. The order dated 28th March, 2009 of the trial court dismissing the application for interrogatories is set aside. The application for serving interrogatories is allowed. The interrogatories no.21 and 22 which were stated to be scandalous are also ordered to be answered since the schedule rates of fee for a designated senior advocate and advocate on record are different and the said position being relevant for adjudication of the matter in controversy. The respondent no.1/plaintiff to answer the interrogatories in accordance with law. However, in the facts of the case, no order as to costs.