Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Heard Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner who is facing charges under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 requested for a copy of the voice sample of the alleged conversion between the complainant and the accused and the Court then furnished him a copy of the voice sample and conversions in a pen-drive. However, along with the pen- drive, its hash value certificate and other details of the pen- drive were not supplied. Accordingly, the petitioner made an application for furnishing the certificate of hash value and other details of the pen-drive but the same was dis-allowed by the learned Sessions Judge and the said order is upheld by the High Court in the impugned judgment.

(b) that two electronic records can produce the same hash result using the algorithm.”

5. Projecting the above, the learned counsel submits that the petitioner would suffer prejudice, if the hash value of the pen-drive supplied to the accused, is not furnished with the other details of the pen-drive.

Issue notice, returnable within four weeks. 

(SWETA BALODI)                                              (KAMLESH RAWAT)
COURT MASTER (SH)                                        ASSISTANT REGISTRAR