Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Abinitio void in Smt. Tarannum C Inamdar vs The Deputy Commissioner And on 2 June, 2021Matching Fragments
The petitioner Smt. Tarannum C. Inamdar W/o Chand Peera is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Habeas Corpus for the following relief:
(a) To declare the detention of Sri Chand Peera @ Ramli S/o Mohammad Gouse Inamdar by order dated 16.10.2020 in No.MAG/CR-48/2020-21 Annexure-A passed by respondent No.1, order dated 22.10.2020 in No.MAG/CR-48/2020-21, Annexure-B passed by respondent No.1 and approved by the respondent No.2 by order No.HD 100 SST 2020, Bengaluru dated 23.10.2020 Annexure-C, HD 100 SST 2020, Bengaluru dated 02.11.2020 Annexure-D approved by respondent No.2 as illegal and void abinitio;
(b) Pass such other order or orders declaring the order of detention, the order of approval and the order of confirmation as illegal and void abinitio;
(c) Pass such other order including release of the detenu forthwith;
(d) Award cost.
During the pendency of the writ petition, by order bearing No.HD 100 SST 2020 dated 02.12.2020 the second respondent State Government, in exercise of its power under Section 13 of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Slum- Grabbers and Video or Audio Pirates Act, 1985 (for short the '1985 Act') extended the period of detention by 12 months. The said order is placed on record along with memo dated 21.04.2021.