Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

4. The main question raised in the memorandum of cross objections is an objection to the procedure of the Land Acquisition Officer and to a lesser extent the procedure of the learned Subordinate Judge in refusing to recognise that the true rental value of the property acquired might not be something higher than the rent actually received by the claimant. No doubt on this basis an additional rent of Re. 1 has been allowed by the learned Subordinate Judge in making his calculations. But we do not think that this amount is sufficient. As already stated, there is evidence that before 1932 the building was a larger one with more accommodation available. There is evidence that for a short time in 1932 a rent of Rs. 9 was actually received from the upper storey. There is evidence that the reason for the collapse of the upper storey and of one of the rooms below was not any structural defect in the building itself but the fact that a neighbouring building fell upon it and this evidence has not been subjected to any cross-examination. We think therefore that although this aspect of the case has not been dealt with in any detail in the evidence, it is reasonably certain that a purchaser by expending whatever is necessary to put the building once again into proper order, and restoring it to its original size could obtain a rental considerably higher than Rs. 15. Of course to do this he would have to incur considerable expenditure, but we feel certain that the net result would be to his advantage. It is conceded that if in fact the present owner of the property has neglected it in such a way as not to derive the true economic rent from it, he should not be penalised on this account by his not being awarded the true market price. The true market price is what a purchaser would give with all possibilities of the purchase present to his mind. It is of course difficult for us to assess this true market value in view of the paucity of the evidence. But we are of opinion that justice will be done as between both parties by assessing this rental value at Rs. 20 a month.