Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

139. P.W.2 has deposed that Ex.P.1179 relating to Smt.A.Jayanthi is issued by the Head Master of Niranjan Higher Primary School. But, Ex.P.1179 shows that it was issued by the Head Master of Jayadeva High School. This circumstance shows that P.W.2 did not verify the document properly. However, he has stated that Jayadeva High School is not in existence. But, he has not stated that the Accused-3 and 4 have created false Undertaking Letters and false Salary Certificates. No material is produced to show that Jayadeva High School is not in existence and that the borrowers, referred to above, are not working in that School. P.W.16 and 18 also have not stated that the said School is not in existence. Even P.W.24 has not collected and produced any evidence in support of the contention of the Complainant. In the absence of such supporting evidence, it is not safe to rely upon the bare Statement of P.W.2. Thus, there is no acceptable evidence to show that Jayadeva High School is not in existence and that 4 borrowers, referred to above, are not working in that School and that Undertaking Letters and Salary Certificates relating to them are false documents. There is also nothing to show that the Accused-3 and 4 have created those documents. Hence, it is not possible to accept the bare contention of the Complainant that the Accused-3 and 4 have created false Undertaking Letters and false Salary Certificates.

145. P.W.2 has deposed that Manjunatha Middle School is not in existence. But, he has not stated that the Accused-3 and 4 have created false Undertaking Letters and false Salary Certificates. No material is produced to show that Manjunatha Middle School is not in existence and that the borrowers, referred to above, are not working in that School. P.W.16 and 18 also have not stated that the said School is not in existence. Even P.W.24 has not collected and produced any evidence in support of the contention of the Complainant. In the absence of such supporting evidence, it is not safe to rely upon the bare Statement of P.W.2. Thus, there is no acceptable evidence to show that Manjunatha Middle School is not in existence and that 5 borrowers, referred to above, are not working in that School and that Undertaking Letters and Salary Certificates relating to them are false documents. There is also nothing to show that the Accused-3 and 4 have created those documents. Hence, it is not possible to accept the bare contention of the Complainant that the 115 [Spl.C.C.92/2004-J] Accused-3 and 4 have created false Undertaking Letters and false Salary Certificates.

159. P.W.2 has deposed that Parameshwara High School is not in existence. But, he has not stated that the Accused-3 and 4 have created false Undertaking Letters and false Salary Certificates. No material is produced to show that Parameshwara High School is not in existence and that the borrowers, referred to above, are not working in that School. P.W.16 and 18 also have not stated that the said School is not in existence. Even P.W.24 has not collected and produced any evidence in support of the contention of the Complainant. In the absence of such supporting evidence, it is not safe to rely upon the bare Statement of P.W.2. Thus, there is no acceptable evidence to show that Parameshwara High School is not in existence and that 5 borrowers, referred to above, are not working in that School and that Undertaking Letters and Salary Certificates relating to them are false documents. There is also nothing to show that the Accused-3 and 4 have created those documents. Hence, it is not possible to accept the bare contention of the Complainant that the Accused-3 and 4 have created false Undertaking Letters and false Salary Certificates.

45. Conclusion

170. On appreciation of the facts, circumstances and the evidence available on record, as observed above, it is clear that the Accused-3 and 4 have created false Salary Certificates and false Undertaking Letters relating to Good Luck Higher Primary School; the Accused-3 has created 133 [Spl.C.C.92/2004-J] false Certificates and false Undertaking Letters relating to Bapuji Higher Primary School; the Accused-3 and P.W.21 have created false Salary Certificates and Undertaking Letters relating to Sai Swamy Higher Primary School; the Accused-3 and 4 along with P.W.19 have created false Salary Certificates and Undertaking Letters relating to Vishweshwaraiah Kannada Higher Primary School; Accused-3 and 4 along with Smt.A.Mary have created false Salary Certificates and Undertaking Letters relating to Navachethana Higher Primary School; Accused-3 with the assistance of Smt.D.V.S.Rao Usha and Smt.K.N.Umadevi have created false Salary Certificates and Undertaking Letters relating to Government Tamil Primary School, the Accused-3 has created Salary Certificates and Undertaking Letters in the names of Smt.Samuel Esther, Sri.Umashankar and Sri.N.Prabhu Das relating to Annapurna High School and the Accused-3 and 4 along with Smt.M.Meena Kumari have created false Salary Certificates and false Undertaking Letters relating to Modern Kannada Higher Primary School for the purpose of availing loan from the Bank. As such, it is clear that the Accused-3 and 4 have forged several Undertaking Letters and Salary Certificates relating to loans pertaining to this case. However, allegations against those Accused regarding forgery of documents relating to other Schools are not proved. So also, there is nothing to show the involvement of the other Accused in the said forgery.