Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Police recruitment in Jai Singh Son Of Shri Rohitash vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 February, 2019Matching Fragments
3. Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Superintendent Of Police, District Kota International (Raj.)
----Respondents
3. S.B. Civil Writs No. 2439/2019 Mahendra Singh Phagna S/o Shri Jai Chand Phagna, Aged (2 of 84) [CW-933/2019] About 44 Years, R/o Vpo Gunineecha, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Superintendent Of Police, Baran- National, District Baran (Raj.)
----Respondents (4 of 84) [CW-933/2019]
8. S.B. Civil Writs No. 2909/2019 Vishnu Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Aged About 20 Years, By Caste Brahmin, Resident Of Village And Post Belari, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Superintendent Of Police, Baran- National, District Baran (Raj.)
----Respondents
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Superintendent Of Police, Kota City, Kota (Raj.)
----Respondents
11. S.B. Civil Writs No. 2935/2019 Nilam Yadav D/o Roop Ram Yadav, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village And Post Babariya, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar (Raj.)
----Petitioner Versus