Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: multi function printer in -Do- vs Oia No.53/2012 (H-Ii) Cus Dt. 31/07/201 on 17 November, 2016Matching Fragments
Appearance Shri Y. Sreenivasa Reddy, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Guna Ranjan, Superintendent(AR) for the respondent.
Coram:
Honble Ms. Sulekha Beevi, C.S., Member(Judicial) Date of Hearing:17/11/2016 Date of decision:17/11/2016 FINAL ORDER No.31222 to 31228/2016 [Order per: Sulekha Beevi, C.S.] The issue involved in the above appeals is whether the goods / multi functional copier-cum-printers imported are liable for confiscation for the reason that they have been imported without licence, in contravention of condition laid in para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy. In all these appeals, the learned counsel Shri Y. Sreenivasa Reddy appearing for the appellants submits that he is not challenging the enhancement of value and confines his argument to the redemption fine and penalty imposed.