Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

It was also stated that in order to extend their business, Plaintiffs had segregated their business into an extensive range of products and services including Sunflower Oil, Rice Bran Oil, Refined Soyabean Oil, Refined Sunflower Oil.

It was stated that to safeguard their interest and rights, Plaintiffs had got registered the following trademarks in various classes:

Application Trademark & Class User Application Disclaimer No./Status Claimed Date 653297 31.10.1991 27.01.1995 Associated with (Registered) trademark application (Class 29) 95, 653293 CS (COMM) 600/23 Madhuri Refiners Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. Vs. OMSHREE AGRO TECH Pvt. Ltd. And Ors.

Plaintiffs were also stated to have other registered trademarks in class 29 bearing application nos. 653293, 653294, 653295, 653296, 653298, 353305, 353306 and 761684, however, the same were not renewed by the Plaintiffs.

It was averred that Plaintiffs had been continuously using their trade mark in relation to goods and business and had built up a great reputation and enviable goodwill thereunder and had acquired proprietary rights therein.

(vi) Ex. PW1/6- Printout of the Plaintiff No. 1's company master data.

(vii) Ex. PW1/7 (Colly) - Status page, and registration certificate of the Plaintiffs' trademark under Application no. 653297 in Class 29.

(viii) Ex. PW1/7A (Colly) - Status page, registration certificate and Journal Copy of the Plaintiffs' trademark under Application no. 2432754 in Class 29.

(ix) Ex. PW1/7B (Colly) - Status page, registration certificate and journal copy of the Plaintiffs' trademark under Application no. 2432755 in Class 35.

Furthermore, reliance has been placed on document Ex. PW1/22 appearing at page no. 337 of the paper book of the CS (COMM) 600/23 Madhuri Refiners Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. Vs. OMSHREE AGRO TECH Pvt. Ltd. And Ors.

Plaintiff's documents to show that defendant no. 1 was also dealing in the same products through interactive website of India Mart and as per defendant's own application Ex. PW1/25 placed at page no. 347, Defendant in its application dated 21.07.2023 had claimed that it intended to use the trademark "Shree Madhur Gold" in respect of products in class 29 and was not stated to be an actual user of the said trade mark as on the date of the said application.