Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4.(a) For clarity, the reliefs sought vide OA No.2601/2018 are reproduced as under:-

(i) Quash termination orders dated 22-11-

2013, 22-11-2013, 25-7-2014,11-12- 2014,12-11-2014, 21-7-2014, 19-12-2014, 3-12-2014,23-6-2014, 25-7-2014, 18-9- 2014, 18-7-2014. 3-12-2014, 22-11-2013, 14-7-2014 and 14-7-2014 (Annexure-A.1);

(ii) quash show cause notices dated 10-11- 2017, 10-11-2017, 9-11-2017, 10-11- 2017, 6-11-2017. 9-11-2017, 10-11-2017, 10-11-2017, 7-11-2017, 9-11-2017, 6-11- 2017, 7-11-2017, 10-11-2017,10-11-2017, 9-11-2017 and 9-11-2017 (Annexure-A.2) ;

(b) Similarly reliefs sought vide the applicant in OA No.3961/2018 are also reproduced as under:-

(i) Quash termination order dated 18.01.2018 and earlier termination order dated 16.07.20 14 of the Applicant

(ii) Direct the respondent to reinstate the applicant in service and to assign him duty to whatever post he is found fit for in the same pay scale that he was drawing as a driver; 

     "(i)    Quash termination order         dated
             18.01.2018;

     (ii)    Direct the respondent to reinstate the

applicant in service and to assign him duty to whatever post he is found fit for in the same pay scale that the was drawing as driver.

(iii) Direct the respondent to pay to applicant the arrears of salary with interest and all other consequential benefits such as seniority, continuity and promotion etc." In the said case of Jagpal Rana (supra), the coordinate Division Bench of this Tribunal in paras 17 to 19 ruled as under:-