Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

16. The contents of the said order dt.28.02.2017 revealed that as per Clause 26(b) installation of G.P.S. (Global Positioning System) devices by a transport contractor is necessary, but after the Work Order dt.11.05.2016 was given to petitioner, in order to avoid installation of G.P.S. to its vehicles, the petitioner had raised a dispute about payment of tea expenses to hamalies and did not undertake transportation of goods on flimsy and baseless ground of non-liability to pay tea mamools to hamalies; and this was a deliberate and intentional attempt to avoid the contract.