Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
petitioner is an a2,1thorit'y, which is substarit:ially financed
by the State Government. They. also in the statement. of
objections. have given the finances provided 'p.3g.t_he'rFiriva&te
Promoters and by the State Promoter_s.__f'~--AC:cording"GIQ
them, the State Promoters have
Rs.434.94 Crores which would
cost. They would also has been
granted exclusive prrv_il'ege under the
concession Agreement. Government of
india on to them. it falls
withinthGe"a:rfibitl::bi' s:u'b}'c1auuse's"l{ii} of Section 2(nn) of AAI
Act. '1'hey.ltvou«1.di"-§u.1~'ther contend the order passed
by the Cornniissionithat the so caiied lease is more in the
l nat,ure._'-of risk cap'i't,ai in financial parlance as quasi equity.
since no interest is subordinate to the loans
given Banks. Thus, they would contend that the
petitioner BIAL is a public authority and it has been
A' -..su}:1st.ant1aily financed by the Government. so as to attract
ll ..,_.the provisions of RTI Act. They would justify the order W
,,/.7
the Commission for importing the definition of
'Substantially financed' as stated in the CAG Aetf-.Even
otherwise, they would contend that
meaning of "substantially financed" would
that the provisions of the Act
also refer t.o the Various agrC.€iT1ent.s:e'nt.ered.'lV--into
the petitioner as well as the other'entrep'reneurs:.3
submits that the AAI Act. 1994 was amended
pursuant to amendment: Act 43 of 2003 and it was to
bring about greater "operational and maxmgerial
independence" as stated in the statement,
reasons of 2003 Amendment Act. Insofar
definition of substantial funding if
the CAG Act is concerned, he
definition of "substantially would
operate in different' ffHCom.miss1on
couid not have V1'e1ied_V_onA.__th__e"iifiefinition to hold
that ti1eff"peti};f:on;§>::"'i is'afisubstvantially financed by the
State. the CAG Act is not in pari
mateifia with 'Act. Thus, the meaning of
if"""snbstafitia1'}yA financed" as defined in CAG Act. is not
Vi??gisi.:~~last contention would be that all Public
Interest V___v'i11fo*rn1ation reiating to BIAL is already
.0."4"'--.v:at{ai1ab1e---if to the public and can be accessed by
a._Aa;o'p1"ofaching the information officer of KSIIDC. Thus.